What is the Difference Between Compensatory and Punitive Damages in a Mass Tort Lawsuit?

Learn about the differences between compensatory and punitive damages in mass tort lawsuits and how they can affect your case.

What is the Difference Between Compensatory and Punitive Damages in a Mass Tort Lawsuit?

When it comes to mass tort lawsuits, there are two types of damages that may be awarded: compensatory and punitive. Compensatory damages are designed to reimburse the plaintiff for any losses they have suffered due to the defendant's actions, while punitive damages are intended to punish the defendant for their wrongdoing. It is important to work with an experienced lawyer to ensure that you receive a fair outcome. Compensatory damages are intended to make up for any actual losses that have been incurred by the plaintiff. This could include medical bills, lost wages, or any other costs associated with the injury or illness.

These damages are meant to put the plaintiff in the same position they would have been in had the defendant not acted negligently. Punitive damages, also known as exemplary damages, are intended to go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff and serve as a deterrent for similar behavior in the future. These damages are rarely awarded on their own and are only available in cases where the defendant acted in a fraudulent, intentional, or reckless manner. Punitive damages are only awarded in approximately 5% of sentences. When it comes to mass tort lawsuits, it is essential to work with an experienced lawyer who can help you navigate the legal system and ensure that you receive a fair outcome. Compensatory and punitive damages can both be awarded in these cases, but it is important to understand the difference between them and how they can affect your case.